Tuesday, October 26, 2010

The Graveyard Book

I often find it difficult to engage in fantasy literature because I am apathetic towards fantastical events. I am disinterested in reading about paranormal activity, magical powers, or outlandish creatures because I do not believe they exist in real life. I found that The Graveyard Book did not deviate from my general disposition regarding this genre.

This book, for me, was a struggle to finish. I was engaged in the plot regarding the mystery surrounding the triple homicide and also the interactions that Bod had with other animate characters. However, I found these situations to be rather transitory throughout the story. The majority of the book centers around life in the cemetery and the spirits who inhabit it. I was neither interested in the nebulous history of the ghosts or their current relationship with Bod. Although I have tried since I was a child, I simply cannot stay focused on a plot that revolves around a fantasy world.

The most aggravating element of fantasy is when humans have the ability to transition into chimerical beings at will. When Miss Lupesco transforms in to the large gray wolf and saves Bod from entering the ghoul city, I had to put the book down. I know there is beauty in imagination, but this particular scene was so unbelievable that it frustrated me. I do not like to imagine these alternate worlds where the sky is red like blood and violent mythical creatures are running rampant. It is just plain creepy.

Taking a critical approach to this story, there were certain elements of fiction that I thought were incomplete. To me, all the characters except for Bod were vastly underdeveloped. Silas, a prominent character throughout the whole story, is never elaborated upon. I was confused as to what his business was in Krakow and I was intrigued with the depiction of his living self as being “…a monster, and worse than any [other] monster” (Gaiman 303). However, the story never goes in to detail as to who Silas was when he was alive or what atrocious crimes he committed that made him, as he proclaimed, a monster. Mistress Owens and her husband are also significant characters with little historical background. These characters are simply present in the graveyard and go about their business daily. Exactly what they do all day, everyday is never explicitly mentioned. I feel that the author failed to develop his main cast of characters, and as a result, he lost his audience rather quickly.

The narrative order in this story is strictly chronological. It follows Bod’s life as it unfolds from his infancy through his fifteenth year. I thought this was a good approach to take for this type of story because we are exposed to his constantly changing relationships within the cemetery as he continues to age as his companions do not. We see how his relationship with Liza becomes strained once he begins to develop into an adolescent. His friendship with Fortinbras wanes while his relationship with Thackery improves as he matures. I think the chronological nature of the narrative shows how life changed in the cemetery for Bod as he developed in to a young man.

In conclusion, although I liked the narrative order of events, I did not like the representation of characters or the overall structure of the plot. Although I can see this book having a strong appeal for students, I would not recommend it to an adult audience. I found it to be a trite and conventional piece of fantasy literature.

1 comment:

  1. Corrie,

    I enjoyed your post because it was not what I was expecting. Usually people love fantasy. It was nice to see that you didn't. I however do love fantasy. I was definitely that adolescent who was convinced their letter from Hogwarts was going to come. I thought the life in the graveyard was interesting to think about. I too wished for more characterization and more background knowledge but sometimes authors leave spaces for you to fill in what you will. However, I thought the author mentioning that Silas was a "monster" was a complete missed opprotunity. I don't know if you can drop a big issue like that and never have it even hinted at previously.

    I also thought the author had a missed opprotunity with the triple homicide. I wanted more background knowledge with the family. I was hoping the triple homicide was more complexed and not just because of Bod's powers. I think JK Rowlings did an excellent job of this in Harry Potter where she showed it wasn't just Harry. In her book she talks about the parents interactions with Voldermont at Hogwarts and goes into detail. I thought it was kind of weak just to make the Jack hunt out the family only to kill a boy who has magical powers and its never explained how he got those powers or if the rest of his family got those powers.

    I agree with you about recommending it to students and not adults. I feel like I can definitely see the distinction between young adult and adult with this novel. I think students would like the fantasy elements and the fact that it takes place in a graveyard. I also think this would be a great movie for adolescents and apparently it's becoming one so we shall see!

    See you tomorrow,

    Tara

    ReplyDelete